Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Substance 2005 Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 10 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortSubstance 2005 Limited(You)KPMG LLPMethods business and digital technology limitedERNST & YOUNG LLPPlaces For People Leisure Management LimitedTHE CENTRAL BRITISH FUND FOR WORLD JEWISH RELIEF
iAuto-picked from 10 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KP KPMG LLP Peer · rank #1 | MB Methods business and digital technology limited Peer · rank #2 | E& ERNST & YOUNG LLP Peer · rank #3 | PF Places For People Leisure Management Limited Peer · rank #4 | S2 Substance 2005 Limited (You) · target supplier | TC THE CENTRAL BRITISH FUND FOR WORLD JEWISH RELIEF Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £324.7m | £55.4m | £44.2m | £39.0m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £44.5m | — | £5.4m | £120.0m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.7bn | £421.6m | £1.7bn | £166.0m | £1.1m(−100%) | £35.2m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 98 | 43 | 53 | 2 | 1(−98%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —