Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Naimuri Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 7 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortNaimuri Limited(You)SoftcatPricewaterhouseCoopers LLPCOMPUTACENTER (UK) LIMITEDWSP UK LimitedViaVan Technologies B.V.
iAuto-picked from 7 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SO Softcat Peer · rank #1 | PR PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Peer · rank #2 | C( COMPUTACENTER (UK) LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | WU WSP UK Limited Peer · rank #4 | NA Naimuri Limited (You) · target supplier | VT ViaVan Technologies B.V. Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £454.6m | £127.8m | £94.8m | £91.1m | £5.7m(−95%) | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £48.2m | £1.2m | £7.5m | £731k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.6bn | £1.4bn | £1.4bn | £2.1bn | £9.9m(−99%) | £5.5m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 477 | 69 | 89 | 169 | 2(−98%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —