Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How City Catering Southampton stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 8 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortCity Catering Southampton(You)Mitie FM LimitedMTX Contracts LimitedMatthews and TannertSuez Recycling and Recovery UK LtdSport and Leisure Management
iAuto-picked from 8 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MF Mitie FM Limited Peer · rank #1 | MC MTX Contracts Limited Peer · rank #2 | MA Matthews and Tannert Peer · rank #3 | SR Suez Recycling and Recovery UK Ltd Peer · rank #4 | CC City Catering Southampton (You) · target supplier | SA Sport and Leisure Management Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £288.3m | £29.5m | £7.1m | £1.8m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | £631k | £89k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.1bn | £238.4m | £207.7m | £802.9m | — | £379.1m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 5 | 7 | 10 | 24 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —