Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How CGA PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months. Target HQ: London.
Value band:
/
CohortCGA PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIMITED(You)AECOM LIMITEDARCADIS CONSULTING UK LTDJacobs UK LtdUP3 SERVICES LIMITEDBaringa Partners LLP
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | AC ARCADIS CONSULTING UK LTD Peer · rank #2 | JU Jacobs UK Ltd Peer · rank #3 | US UP3 SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | BP Baringa Partners LLP Peer · rank #5 | CP CGA PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £219.5m | £67.7m | £47.9m | £18.0m | £11.1m | £131k(−100%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £4.8m | £706k | £264k | — | £703k | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £827.8m | £316.7m | £1.4bn | £25.0m | £146.9m | £131k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 132 | 89 | 79 | 1 | 20 | 2 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —