Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How METRO DYNAMICS LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: London.
Value band:
/
CohortMETRO DYNAMICS LIMITED(You)PA CONSULTING SERVICES LIMITEDPricewaterhouseCoopers LLPUCL Consultants LtdInner Circle Consulting LimitedIpsos Mori
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PC PA CONSULTING SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | PR PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Peer · rank #2 | UC UCL Consultants Ltd Peer · rank #3 | IC Inner Circle Consulting Limited Peer · rank #4 | IM Ipsos Mori Peer · rank #5 | MD METRO DYNAMICS LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £332.8m | £52.1m | £7.1m | £6.8m | £4.2m | £166k(−98%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £14.7m | — | — | — | £4.0m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.8bn | £266.2m | £49.5m | £18.7m | £137.2m | £7.2m(−95%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 57 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 3 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —