Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How PROGRESS FACILITIES MANAGEMENT LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortPROGRESS FACILITIES MANAGEMENT LIMITED(You)Kier ConstructionESH CONSTRUCTION LIMITEDHenry Boot Construction LimitedC R MacDonald LimitedEnable Infrastructure Ltd
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KC Kier Construction Peer · rank #1 | EC ESH CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | HB Henry Boot Construction Limited Peer · rank #3 | PF PROGRESS FACILITIES MANAGEMENT LIMITED (You) · target supplier | CR C R MacDonald Limited Peer · rank #5 | EI Enable Infrastructure Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £4.3bn | £90.7m | £22.7m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £1.0m | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £12.4bn | £1.5bn | £775.5m | £468k(−100%) | £13.5m | £19.3m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 37 | 28 | 4 | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —