Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How PACEMAKE LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 8 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortPACEMAKE LIMITED(You)Ian WilliamsIon Property Developments LimitedMatthews and TannertBarnes ConstructionB Ball Contractors Ltd
iAuto-picked from 8 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | IW Ian Williams Peer · rank #1 | IP Ion Property Developments Limited Peer · rank #2 | MA Matthews and Tannert Peer · rank #3 | PA PACEMAKE LIMITED (You) · target supplier | BC Barnes Construction Peer · rank #5 | BB B Ball Contractors Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £235.2m | £8.0m | £7.1m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £231k | — | £631k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.0bn | £8.4m | £207.7m | £55k(−100%) | £80.1m | £4.2m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 22 | 1 | 10 | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —