Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Grasshopper Communications stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortGrasshopper Communications(You)PA CONSULTING SERVICES LIMITEDJacobs UK LtdMatrix SCM LimitedArcadis LLPTony Gee & Partners
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PC PA CONSULTING SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | JU Jacobs UK Ltd Peer · rank #2 | MS Matrix SCM Limited Peer · rank #3 | AR Arcadis LLP Peer · rank #4 | TG Tony Gee & Partners Peer · rank #5 | GC Grasshopper Communications (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £332.8m | £47.9m | £19.5m | £6.6m | £1.2m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £14.7m | £264k | £125k | £53k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.8bn | £1.4bn | £1.7bn | £469.0m | £1.4m | £65k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 57 | 79 | 10 | 15 | 1 | 1(−93%) |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —