Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Q C Engineering Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortQ C Engineering Ltd(You)Parade Civil Engineering LimitedNibra Signs LTDDynamik Construction Services LtdSTANDARD SIGNS & TRAFFIC SYSTEMS LIMITEDSutton Creative Ltd
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PC Parade Civil Engineering Limited Peer · rank #1 | QC Q C Engineering Ltd (You) · target supplier | NS Nibra Signs LTD Peer · rank #3 | DC Dynamik Construction Services Ltd Peer · rank #4 | SS STANDARD SIGNS & TRAFFIC SYSTEMS LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | SC Sutton Creative Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £223k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £5.6m | £140k(−2%) | £841k | £73k | £144k | £34k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 3 | — | — | — | ||
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —