Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How ProSentry Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 14 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortProSentry Ltd(You)Mitie FM LimitedG4S Secure Solutions (UK) LimitedThales UK LimitedThales DIS UK LtdVigilant Protect UK Limited
iAuto-picked from 14 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MF Mitie FM Limited Peer · rank #1 | GS G4S Secure Solutions (UK) Limited Peer · rank #2 | PR ProSentry Ltd (You) · target supplier | TU Thales UK Limited Peer · rank #4 | TD Thales DIS UK Ltd Peer · rank #5 | VP Vigilant Protect UK Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £288.3m | £53.8m | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | £8.4m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.1bn | £770.9m | £275k(−100%) | £3.6bn | £316.2m | £3.6m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 5 | 5 | 1(−80%) | 3 | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —