Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How PENWARDEN HALE LTD stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortPENWARDEN HALE LTD(You)AECOM LIMITEDWSP UK LimitedMace Consult LimitedGLEEDS COST MANAGEMENT LIMITEDTetra Tech Limited
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AE AECOM LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | WU WSP UK Limited Peer · rank #2 | MC Mace Consult Limited Peer · rank #3 | GC GLEEDS COST MANAGEMENT LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | TT Tetra Tech Limited Peer · rank #5 | PH PENWARDEN HALE LTD (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £223.8m | £89.1m | £71.1m | £35.4m | £11.9m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £5.5m | £731k | — | £50.4m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £834.6m | £1.8bn | £738.8m | £336.4m | £211.4m | £194k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 144 | 159 | 17 | 29 | 48 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —