Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Clean For Good stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortClean For Good(You)TOTAL SUPPORT SERVICES LIMITEDMitie Technical Facilities Management LtdKINGDOM SERVICES GROUP LIMITEDNorse Commercial Services LtdBirkin Cleaning
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | TS TOTAL SUPPORT SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | MT Mitie Technical Facilities Management Ltd Peer · rank #2 | KS KINGDOM SERVICES GROUP LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | NC Norse Commercial Services Ltd Peer · rank #4 | CF Clean For Good (You) · target supplier | BC Birkin Cleaning Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £14.2m | £4.3m | £1.4m | £405k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | £233k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £45.6m | £81.1m | £103.4m | £4.8bn | £28k(−100%) | £55.1m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 5 | 3 | 5 | 10 | — | 6 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —