Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How KR Tech stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortKR Tech(You)TESLA ENGINEERING LIMITEDOxford Instruments Nanotechnology Tools Limited T/A Oxford InstrHangzhou Permanent Magnet Group LimitedHangzhou Permanenet Magnet Group (HPMG)Felix Technologies Inc
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KT KR Tech (You) · target supplier | TE TESLA ENGINEERING LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | OI | HP Hangzhou Permanent Magnet Group Limited Peer · rank #4 | HP Hangzhou Permanenet Magnet Group (HPMG) Peer · rank #5 | FT Felix Technologies Inc Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £585k(+59%) | £3.4m | £885k | £367k | £233k | £202k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | — | 1 | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —