Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How UK Archiving stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortUK Archiving(You)IRON MOUNTAIN (UK) PLCRestore PlcSVGC LIMITEDOASIS GroupCompass Minerals Storage & Archives Limited (trading as Deep
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | IM IRON MOUNTAIN (UK) PLC Peer · rank #1 | RE Restore Plc Peer · rank #2 | SV SVGC LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | UA UK Archiving (You) · target supplier | OG OASIS Group Peer · rank #5 | CM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £20.1m | £7.4m | £3.6m | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £1.5m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £574.3m | £242.7m | £80.7m | — | £1.9m | £385k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 12 | 11 | 20 | — | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —