Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How UCL stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 11 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortUCL(You)KPMG LLPMOTT MACDONALD LIMITEDNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCHYonder Consulting LimitedMCKINSEY & COMPANY INC UNITED KINGDOM
iAuto-picked from 11 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KP KPMG LLP Peer · rank #1 | MM MOTT MACDONALD LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | NC NATIONAL CENTRE FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH Peer · rank #3 | YC Yonder Consulting Limited Peer · rank #4 | UC UCL (You) · target supplier | M& MCKINSEY & COMPANY INC UNITED KINGDOM Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £324.0m | £59.0m | £24.0m | £5.9m | £1.4m(−94%) | £600k |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £44.5m | £22k | £48k | — | £68k(+41%) | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.7bn | £1.1bn | £209.6m | £24.2m | £1.6m(−99%) | £119.3m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 97 | 75 | 17 | 8 | 2(−88%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —