Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How george watt & stewart stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
Cohortgeorge watt & stewart(You)MOTT MACDONALD LIMITEDTurner & Townsend Project Management LtdRidge and Partners LLPMASON CLARK ASSOCIATES LIMITEDPellings LLP
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MM MOTT MACDONALD LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | T& Turner & Townsend Project Management Ltd Peer · rank #2 | RA Ridge and Partners LLP Peer · rank #3 | MC MASON CLARK ASSOCIATES LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | PE Pellings LLP Peer · rank #5 | GW george watt & stewart (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £59.0m | £42.0m | £9.2m | £5.3m | £1.5m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £22k | — | £59k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.5bn | £521.8m | £208.9m | £28.6m | £148.4m | — |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 75 | 22 | 39 | 22 | 4 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —