Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Cox Drew Neale LLP stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 6 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortCox Drew Neale LLP(You)Mace Consult LimitedMOTTRAM ASSOCIATES LIMITEDJacobs UK LtdCARROLL GROUP LIMITEDPRP
iAuto-picked from 6 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MC Mace Consult Limited Peer · rank #1 | MA MOTTRAM ASSOCIATES LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | JU Jacobs UK Ltd Peer · rank #3 | CG CARROLL GROUP LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | PR PRP Peer · rank #5 | CD Cox Drew Neale LLP (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £70.8m | £59.1m | £48.5m | £3.6m | £762k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £2.6m | £22k | £264k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £738.3m | £1.5bn | £1.4bn | £22.0m | £101.6m | £83k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 16 | 83 | 83 | 3 | 2 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —