Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How SES Business Water stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortSES Business Water(You)C.L.C. CONTRACTORS LIMITEDR. BENSON PROPERTY MAINTENANCE LIMITEDLAKER BUILDING MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LIMITEDScottish Water Business StreamMITIE WASTE & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CC C.L.C. CONTRACTORS LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | RB R. BENSON PROPERTY MAINTENANCE LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | LB LAKER BUILDING MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | SW Scottish Water Business Stream Peer · rank #4 | MW MITIE WASTE & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | SB SES Business Water (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £79.2m | £40.1m | £29.9m | £16.1m | £2.0m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | £121.0m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £227.7m | £110.6m | £91.3m | £249.7m | £187.3m | £48k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 25 | 4 | 2 | 19 | 4 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —