Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Right to Care Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortRight to Care Ltd(You)Blackhawk Network EMEA LtdConnections Care LtdAction For Children Services LimitedWest HouseDDM Health Ltd
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | BN Blackhawk Network EMEA Ltd Peer · rank #1 | CC Connections Care Ltd Peer · rank #2 | AF Action For Children Services Limited Peer · rank #3 | RT Right to Care Ltd (You) · target supplier | WH West House Peer · rank #5 | DH DDM Health Ltd Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £9.5m | £1.2m | £450k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £75.0m | £3.4m | £109.5m | — | £2.7m | £3.1m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 6 | 3 | 1 | — | — | 2 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —