Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How The Rockfine Group Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: West Midlands.
Value band:
/
CohortThe Rockfine Group Limited(You)Tetra Tech International Development LimitedIMSLThe Activation Project C.I.C.Inspire SuffolkEmma Wells Tennis
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | TT Tetra Tech International Development Limited Peer · rank #1 | IM IMSL Peer · rank #2 | TR The Rockfine Group Limited (You) · target supplier | TA The Activation Project C.I.C. Peer · rank #4 | IS Inspire Suffolk Peer · rank #5 | EW Emma Wells Tennis Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £2.0m | £1.0m | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £111.8m | £1.1m | £16k(−99%) | £1.9m | £1.3m | £700k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 1 | 1 | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —