Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How James Mackintosh Architects Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 8 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortJames Mackintosh Architects Ltd(You)MOTT MACDONALD LIMITEDJacobs UK LtdTurner & Townsend Project Management LtdALLIANCE LEISURE SERVICES LIMITEDAHR Building Consultancy Ltd
iAuto-picked from 8 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MM MOTT MACDONALD LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | JU Jacobs UK Ltd Peer · rank #2 | T& Turner & Townsend Project Management Ltd Peer · rank #3 | AL ALLIANCE LEISURE SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | AB AHR Building Consultancy Ltd Peer · rank #5 | JM James Mackintosh Architects Ltd (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £59.0m | £47.9m | £42.0m | £14.7m | £4.0m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £22k | £264k | — | — | £53k | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.5bn | £1.4bn | £521.8m | £90.5m | £37.0m | £60k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 75 | 79 | 22 | 11 | 8 | 1(−95%) |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —