Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How C THE SIGNS LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 5 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: London.
Value band:
/
CohortC THE SIGNS LIMITED(You)Phoenix Software LimitedOracle Corporation UK LimitedCACI LIMITEDAtamis LtdFRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 5 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PS Phoenix Software Limited Peer · rank #1 | OC Oracle Corporation UK Limited Peer · rank #2 | CA CACI LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | AT Atamis Ltd Peer · rank #4 | FC FRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | CT C THE SIGNS LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £289.6m | £161.7m | £47.5m | £18.9m | £10.5m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £471k | £2.5m | — | £18.1m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £3.7bn | £1.0bn | £158.4m | £73.4m | £247.2m | £3.7m(−99%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 225 | 71 | 29 | 11 | 19 | 2(−93%) |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —