Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How ELEVATE B C LTD stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 12 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortELEVATE B C LTD(You)CGI IT UK LIMITEDSoftcatKPMG LLPERNST & YOUNG LLPFRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 12 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CI CGI IT UK LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | SO Softcat Peer · rank #2 | KP KPMG LLP Peer · rank #3 | E& ERNST & YOUNG LLP Peer · rank #4 | FC FRAZER-NASH CONSULTANCY LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | EB ELEVATE B C LTD (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £535.5m | £453.7m | £324.7m | £44.2m | £22.9m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £17.3m | £48.3m | £44.5m | £5.4m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.9bn | £1.6bn | £4.7bn | £1.7bn | £247.2m | — |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 32 | 479 | 98 | 53 | 23 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —