Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Panda Bridge Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortPanda Bridge Limited(You)CAPGEMINI UK PLCCGI IT UK LIMITEDPA CONSULTING SERVICES LIMITEDPA ConsultingVeran Performance Ltd
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CU CAPGEMINI UK PLC Peer · rank #1 | CI CGI IT UK LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | PC PA CONSULTING SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | PC PA Consulting Peer · rank #4 | VP Veran Performance Ltd Peer · rank #5 | PB Panda Bridge Limited (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £642.6m | £535.5m | £334.4m | £99.9m | £5.7m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £51.0m | £17.3m | £14.7m | — | £5.5m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.2bn | £1.9bn | £1.8bn | £303.7m | £460.7m | — |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 39 | 32 | 59 | 10 | 6 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —