Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Variopool stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortVariopool(You)Schofield and Sons LtdMainmark Ground Engineering (UK) LtdTotal Pool LtdPool Tech ServicesArcus Products Limited
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SA Schofield and Sons Ltd Peer · rank #1 | VA Variopool (You) · target supplier | MG Mainmark Ground Engineering (UK) Ltd Peer · rank #3 | TP Total Pool Ltd Peer · rank #4 | PT Pool Tech Services Peer · rank #5 | AP Arcus Products Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £583k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.6m | £41k(−81%) | £270k | £183k | £217k | £148k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 4 | — | — | — | ||
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —