Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Halo Labs stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortHalo Labs(You)BRUKER UK LIMITEDQuantum DesignMetPrep LimitedHiden Isochema LtdOPTIMAX IMAGING, INSPECTION AND MEASUREMENT LTD
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | BU BRUKER UK LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | QD Quantum Design Peer · rank #2 | HL Halo Labs (You) · target supplier | ME MetPrep Limited Peer · rank #4 | HI Hiden Isochema Ltd Peer · rank #5 | OI OPTIMAX IMAGING, INSPECTION AND MEASUREMENT LTD Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £3.1m | £286k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £90.9m | £6.1m | £112k(−90%) | £1.1m | £602k | £711k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 12 | 1 | — | — | 1 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —