Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Sequoia CH Group Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 4 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortSequoia CH Group Ltd(You)Camarinal HoldingsAddiction Recovery AgencyCONNECTION SUPPORTLiving StreetsCity Health Care Partnership CIC
iAuto-picked from 4 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SC Sequoia CH Group Ltd (You) · target supplier | CH Camarinal Holdings Peer · rank #2 | AR Addiction Recovery Agency Peer · rank #3 | CS CONNECTION SUPPORT Peer · rank #4 | LS Living Streets Peer · rank #5 | CH City Health Care Partnership CIC Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | — | £7.3m | £10.5m | £4.6m | £977k | £181.3m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | — | — | — | 3 | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —