Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Kikapay Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 4 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortKikapay Limited(You)PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPAtosNEC Software Solutions UK LimitedAllpay LimitedTyne and Wear Pension Fund
iAuto-picked from 4 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PR PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Peer · rank #1 | AT Atos Peer · rank #2 | NS NEC Software Solutions UK Limited Peer · rank #3 | AL Allpay Limited Peer · rank #4 | KI Kikapay Limited (You) · target supplier | TA Tyne and Wear Pension Fund Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £92.7m | £87.7m | £40.3m | £11.3m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £1.2m | £35k | £4.3m | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.1bn | £6.3bn | £281.3m | £210.3m | — | £7.9m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 65 | 10 | 51 | 37 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —