Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How SUPER WHIPPY ICE CREAM LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 5 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortSUPER WHIPPY ICE CREAM LIMITED(You)Thomas Ridley Foodservice LtdSport and Leisure ManagementBENUGO LIMITEDAramark UKBFS GROUP LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 5 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | TR Thomas Ridley Foodservice Ltd Peer · rank #1 | SW SUPER WHIPPY ICE CREAM LIMITED (You) · target supplier | SA Sport and Leisure Management Peer · rank #3 | BE BENUGO LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | AU Aramark UK Peer · rank #5 | BG BFS GROUP LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £120k | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | £827.1m |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £45.1m | £87k(−100%) | £379.1m | £52.8m | £220.3m | £894.3m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 1 | 1(−60%) | — | 1 | ||
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —