Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Asphalt Surface Dressing Services Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 8 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortAsphalt Surface Dressing Services Ltd (You)TARMAC TRADING LIMITEDM J CHURCH (PLANT) LIMITEDRingway Infrastructure Services LimitedMarlborough Highways LimitedM GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 8 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | TT TARMAC TRADING LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | AS Asphalt Surface Dressing Services Ltd (You) · target supplier | MJ M J CHURCH (PLANT) LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | RI Ringway Infrastructure Services Limited Peer · rank #4 | MH Marlborough Highways Limited Peer · rank #5 | MG M GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £13.0m | £540k | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | £2.0bn | — | £123.3m |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.8bn | £917k(−100%) | £21.3bn | £4.8bn | £451.1m | £123.3m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 49 | 1(−67%) | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —