Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How JULES AND FIELD LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortJULES AND FIELD LIMITED(You)Deloitte LLPMastek (UK) Ltd.Gartner UK LimitedBaringa Partners LLPCAPGEMINI FINANCIAL SERVICES UK LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | DE Deloitte LLP Peer · rank #1 | M( Mastek (UK) Ltd. Peer · rank #2 | GU Gartner UK Limited Peer · rank #3 | BP Baringa Partners LLP Peer · rank #4 | JA JULES AND FIELD LIMITED (You) · target supplier | CF CAPGEMINI FINANCIAL SERVICES UK LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £158.3m | £154.0m | £14.0m | £11.1m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £5.5m | £10.2m | £124k | £703k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.9bn | £900.3m | £78.8m | £146.9m | £42k(−100%) | £188.9m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 92 | 11 | 64 | 20 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —