Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Ml Hughes Construction stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortMl Hughes Construction(You)ESH CONSTRUCTION LIMITEDWhitemountain Quarries LtdJohn Sisk and Son LtdCompass Developments (NE) LimitedBarnes Construction
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | EC ESH CONSTRUCTION LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | WQ Whitemountain Quarries Ltd Peer · rank #2 | JS John Sisk and Son Ltd Peer · rank #3 | CD Compass Developments (NE) Limited Peer · rank #4 | MH Ml Hughes Construction (You) · target supplier | BC Barnes Construction Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £56.6m | £12.0m | £4.6m | £663k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £1.0m | — | — | £2.5m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.5bn | £27.0m | £271.7m | £72.2m | — | £80.1m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 31 | 3 | 1 | 4 | — | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —