Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How NASH Maritime Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 10 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortNASH Maritime Ltd(You)PA ConsultingJACOBS U.K. LIMITEDBaringa Partners LLPHARMONY FIRE LIMITEDArcadis LLP
iAuto-picked from 10 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | PC PA Consulting Peer · rank #1 | JU JACOBS U.K. LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | BP Baringa Partners LLP Peer · rank #3 | HF HARMONY FIRE LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | AR Arcadis LLP Peer · rank #5 | NM NASH Maritime Ltd (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £92.5m | £28.0m | £11.1m | £7.9m | £6.6m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £767k | £703k | — | £53k | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £303.7m | £546.2m | £146.9m | £409.2m | £469.0m | £405k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 9 | 33 | 20 | 11 | 15 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —