Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How TryHackMe Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortTryHackMe Ltd(You)SoftcatKPMG LLPPhoenix Software LimitedOracle Corporation UK LimitedAtamis Ltd
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SO Softcat Peer · rank #1 | KP KPMG LLP Peer · rank #2 | PS Phoenix Software Limited Peer · rank #3 | OC Oracle Corporation UK Limited Peer · rank #4 | AT Atamis Ltd Peer · rank #5 | TR TryHackMe Ltd (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £474.9m | £314.3m | £286.4m | £161.8m | £19.2m | £67k(−100%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £105.5m | £4.5m | £275k | £2.5m | £18.1m | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.5bn | £4.7bn | £3.7bn | £1.0bn | £73.6m | £96k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 492 | 91 | 220 | 74 | 13 | 2 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —