Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Social Machines Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 8 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortSocial Machines Limited (You)CHASE SERVICES GROUP LTDVCARE-24 LIMITEDSmall Steps Matter LimitedDERBY CITY MISSION LIMITEDLeeds Trinity University
iAuto-picked from 8 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CS CHASE SERVICES GROUP LTD Peer · rank #1 | VC VCARE-24 LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | SS Small Steps Matter Limited Peer · rank #3 | SM Social Machines Limited (You) · target supplier | DC DERBY CITY MISSION LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | LT Leeds Trinity University Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £3.6m | £817k | £547k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £89.8m | £817k | £547k | — | £715k | £107.9m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 19 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —