Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Think Philanthropy stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortThink Philanthropy(You)Deloitte LLPPricewaterhouseCoopers LLPNEWTON CONSULTING LIMITEDIRON MOUNTAIN (UK) PLCAtkinsrÉalis UK Limited
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | DE Deloitte LLP Peer · rank #1 | PR PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Peer · rank #2 | NC NEWTON CONSULTING LIMITED Peer · rank #3 | IM IRON MOUNTAIN (UK) PLC Peer · rank #4 | AU AtkinsrÉalis UK Limited Peer · rank #5 | TP Think Philanthropy (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £152.8m | £95.6m | £69.2m | £20.1m | £2.9m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £5.5m | £5.6m | £400k | £1.5m | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.9bn | £1.1bn | £93.7m | £574.3m | £13.3m | £16k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 94 | 65 | 13 | 12 | 11 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —