Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How CITISENSE LTD stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortCITISENSE LTD(You)Deloitte LLPERNST & YOUNG LLPTaylor Woodrow Infrastructure LimitedAll Roads Asphalt Solutions LTDDLA PIPER EUROPE LLP
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | DE Deloitte LLP Peer · rank #1 | E& ERNST & YOUNG LLP Peer · rank #2 | TW Taylor Woodrow Infrastructure Limited Peer · rank #3 | AR All Roads Asphalt Solutions LTD Peer · rank #4 | DP DLA PIPER EUROPE LLP Peer · rank #5 | CI CITISENSE LTD (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £418.9m | £99.4m | £33.0m | £10.2m | £7.2m | £37k(−100%) |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £2.7m | £963k | — | — | £55k | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.8bn | £1.8bn | £162.5m | £14.8m | £173.4m | £3.3m(−98%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 90 | 59 | 10 | 7 | 21 | 13 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —