Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How CITISENSE LTD stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortCITISENSE LTD(You)Galliford Try Construction LimitedTurner & Townsend Project Management LtdDLA Piper UK LLPPellings LLPVEALE WASBROUGH VIZARDS LLP
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | GT Galliford Try Construction Limited Peer · rank #1 | T& Turner & Townsend Project Management Ltd Peer · rank #2 | DP DLA Piper UK LLP Peer · rank #3 | PE Pellings LLP Peer · rank #4 | CI CITISENSE LTD (You) · target supplier | VW VEALE WASBROUGH VIZARDS LLP Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £189.7m | £42.0m | £6.1m | £1.5m | £55k(−99%) | £36k |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | £55k | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.9bn | £521.8m | £108.6m | £148.4m | £3.3m(−98%) | £14.2m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 11 | 22 | 18 | 4 | 16(+45%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —