Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Birmingham Women's & Children's NHS Foundation Trust stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortBirmingham Women's & Children's NHS Foundation Trust(You)Agito MedicalInHealth LtdUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF LEICESTER NHS TRUSTNes Holdings (UK) LimitedQBTECH Limited
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AM Agito Medical Peer · rank #1 | IN InHealth Ltd Peer · rank #2 | BW Birmingham Women's & Children's NHS Foundation Trust (You) · target supplier | UH UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF LEICESTER NHS TRUST Peer · rank #4 | NH Nes Holdings (UK) Limited Peer · rank #5 | QB QBTECH Limited Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £3.7m | £2.2m | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.5m | £525.9m | — | £438.5m | £21.6m | £433k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 2 | 5 | — | — | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —