Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Field Fisher Waterhouse stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 3 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortField Fisher Waterhouse(You)MILLS & REEVE LLPDLA PIPER EUROPE LLPAshurstTLT LLPBurges Salmon LLP
iAuto-picked from 3 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | M& MILLS & REEVE LLP Peer · rank #1 | DP DLA PIPER EUROPE LLP Peer · rank #2 | AS Ashurst Peer · rank #3 | TL TLT LLP Peer · rank #4 | BS Burges Salmon LLP Peer · rank #5 | FF Field Fisher Waterhouse (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £12.2m | £7.6m | £7.4m | £5.0m | £4.6m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £685k | £55k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £190.9m | £173.4m | £222.9m | £181.3m | £213.8m | £2.4m(−99%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 32 | 22 | 35 | 25 | 28 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —