Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How JACKSON & LACEY CONSTRUCTION stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortJACKSON & LACEY CONSTRUCTION(You)Kelwel Care LimitedOne YMCACentrepoint SohoMacIntyreCamarinal Holdings
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | KC Kelwel Care Limited Peer · rank #1 | J& JACKSON & LACEY CONSTRUCTION (You) · target supplier | OY One YMCA Peer · rank #3 | CS Centrepoint Soho Peer · rank #4 | MA MacIntyre Peer · rank #5 | CH Camarinal Holdings Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £16.9m | — | — | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £17.2m | £35k(−100%) | £66.9m | £46.6m | £63.1m | £7.3m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 1 | 1(0%) | 1 | 7 | ||
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —