Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Remote Monitoring Services Group Limited stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 2 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortRemote Monitoring Services Group Limited(You)OPENVIEW SECURITY SOLUTIONS LIMITEDCHUBB FIRE & SECURITY LIMITEDADT FIRE AND SECURITYTrinity Fire & Security Systems LtdKings Security Systems Ltd T/A Kings Secure Technologies Ltd
iAuto-picked from 2 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | OS OPENVIEW SECURITY SOLUTIONS LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | CF CHUBB FIRE & SECURITY LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | AF ADT FIRE AND SECURITY Peer · rank #3 | TF Trinity Fire & Security Systems Ltd Peer · rank #4 | KS | RM Remote Monitoring Services Group Limited (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £20.9m | £1.4m | £71k | £11k | £98.17 | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £540k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £362.0m | £99.6m | £12.5m | £32.6m | £61.4m | £140k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 14 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 2 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —