Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Applied Management Techniques Ltd stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortApplied Management Techniques Ltd(You)CAPGEMINI UK PLCRSK Environment LtdItad LtdEcorys UKSIEMENS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CU CAPGEMINI UK PLC Peer · rank #1 | RE RSK Environment Ltd Peer · rank #2 | IT Itad Ltd Peer · rank #3 | EU Ecorys UK Peer · rank #4 | SP SIEMENS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY Peer · rank #5 | AM Applied Management Techniques Ltd (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £641.7m | £5.2m | £3.4m | £2.6m | £39k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £51.0m | — | — | — | £100k | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £4.2bn | £93.4m | £69.8m | £124.9m | £93.5m | £22k(−100%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 38 | 16 | 2 | 5 | 4 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —