Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How PHL Group stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 4 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortPHL Group(You)Anna FreudOperose HealthPertemps Medical LimitedLeeds and York Partnership Foundation TrustSouth Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust
iAuto-picked from 4 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AF Anna Freud Peer · rank #1 | OH Operose Health Peer · rank #2 | PM Pertemps Medical Limited Peer · rank #3 | PG PHL Group (You) · target supplier | LA Leeds and York Partnership Foundation Trust Peer · rank #5 | ST South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £7.0m | £6.8m | £502k | — | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £8.8m | £161.3m | £12.1m | £12.1m(−0%) | £11.7m | £61.6m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1(−50%) | — | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —