Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How M GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: Eastern.
Value band:
/
CohortM GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITED(You)BALFOUR BEATTY CIVIL ENGINEERING LIMITEDBAM Building and InfrastructureKier Integrated ServicesAndrew Johnson Construction LtdMartin Arnold Associates LLP
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | BB BALFOUR BEATTY CIVIL ENGINEERING LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | BB BAM Building and Infrastructure Peer · rank #2 | KI Kier Integrated Services Peer · rank #3 | AJ Andrew Johnson Construction Ltd Peer · rank #4 | MA Martin Arnold Associates LLP Peer · rank #5 | MG M GROUP HIGHWAYS LIMITED (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £170.3m | £55.0m | £15.1m | £6.8m | £1.0m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | £4.0m |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £3.5bn | £77.1m | £1.7bn | £6.8m | £1.0m | £4.0m(−95%) |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 10 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —