Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Rail Alliance stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortRail Alliance(You)MORSON HUMAN RESOURCES LIMITEDNETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITEDNorthern Trains Limited
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | MH MORSON HUMAN RESOURCES LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | NR NETWORK RAIL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED Peer · rank #2 | RA Rail Alliance (You) · target supplier | NT Northern Trains Limited Peer · rank #4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £45.4m | £69k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £105.8m | £47.9m | £450k(−99%) | £89k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 10 | 6 | — | — |
| Contracts (lifetime)All awards on record | 44 | 59 | 1(−98%) | 1 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —