Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How N&P CRAYFORD MRF LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: South East.
Value band:
/
CohortN&P CRAYFORD MRF LIMITED(You)CBRE MANAGED SERVICES LIMITEDSuez Recycling and Recovery UK LtdS.I.Sealy & Associates LtdBUILDING DESIGN PARTNERSHIP LIMITEDPure energy group
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | CM CBRE MANAGED SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | SR Suez Recycling and Recovery UK Ltd Peer · rank #2 | S& S.I.Sealy & Associates Ltd Peer · rank #3 | BD BUILDING DESIGN PARTNERSHIP LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | NC N&P CRAYFORD MRF LIMITED (You) · target supplier | PE Pure energy group Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £60.9m | £1.7m | £1.4m | £672k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £89k | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £2.9bn | £974.1m | £67.9m | £26.0m | £11.3m(−83%) | £13.9m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 16 | 23 | 2 | 10 | 3(−77%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —