Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How Pretty Little Wigs By Hollie LTD stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 5 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortPretty Little Wigs By Hollie LTD(You)Arden Winch & Co.LtdTry & Lilly LtdBanbury Postiche Ltd
iAuto-picked from 5 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | AW Arden Winch & Co.Ltd Peer · rank #1 | T& Try & Lilly Ltd Peer · rank #2 | PL Pretty Little Wigs By Hollie LTD (You) · target supplier | BP Banbury Postiche Ltd Peer · rank #4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £647k | £166k | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £116k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £96.5m | £5.2m | £113k(−98%) | £572k |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 2 | 4 | — | — |
| Contracts (lifetime)All awards on record | 64 | 15 | 2(−87%) | 8 |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —