Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How HTL.tech stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 20 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months.
Value band:
/
CohortHTL.tech(You)SoftcatPhoenix Software LimitedCDW UK LtdMatthews and TannertALPHATRACK SYSTEMS LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 20 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | SO Softcat Peer · rank #1 | PS Phoenix Software Limited Peer · rank #2 | CU CDW UK Ltd Peer · rank #3 | MA Matthews and Tannert Peer · rank #4 | AS ALPHATRACK SYSTEMS LIMITED Peer · rank #5 | HT HTL.tech (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £443.8m | £293.8m | £202.6m | £7.1m | £6.2m | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | £48.3m | £471k | £123k | £631k | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £1.6bn | £3.7bn | £1.3bn | £207.7m | £60.3m | — |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 463 | 219 | 127 | 10 | 5 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —