Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How IMAIL COMMS LIMITED stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 7 signature CPV codes over the last 24 months. Target HQ: West Midlands.
Value band:
/
CohortIMAIL COMMS LIMITED(You)EQUANS SERVICES LIMITEDAtosIRON MOUNTAIN (UK) PLCHH ASSOCIATES UK LIMITEDRESTORE DIGITAL LIMITED
iAuto-picked from 7 signature CPV codes · last 24 months overlap
Metric | ES EQUANS SERVICES LIMITED Peer · rank #1 | AT Atos Peer · rank #2 | IM IRON MOUNTAIN (UK) PLC Peer · rank #3 | HA HH ASSOCIATES UK LIMITED Peer · rank #4 | IC IMAIL COMMS LIMITED (You) · target supplier | RD RESTORE DIGITAL LIMITED Peer · rank #6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £143.1m | £87.7m | £20.1m | £11.5m | — | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | £35k | £1.5m | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £302.0m | £6.3bn | £574.3m | £12.0m | £1.4m(−100%) | £257.9m |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 3 | 10 | 12 | 1 | 1(−85%) | |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —