Supplier · Peer benchmark
Peer comparison
How OnCue Transport stacks up against suppliers competing for the same workloads — based on overlap with its 1 signature CPV code over the last 24 months. Target HQ: London.
Value band:
/
CohortOnCue Transport(You)Taw & Torridge Coaches LtdJas Cars LtdTamar Coaches LtdHolsworthy LtdLinden Holdings (Devon) Ltd
iAuto-picked from 1 signature CPV code · last 24 months overlap
Metric | T& Taw & Torridge Coaches Ltd Peer · rank #1 | JC Jas Cars Ltd Peer · rank #2 | TC Tamar Coaches Ltd Peer · rank #3 | HO Holsworthy Ltd Peer · rank #4 | LH Linden Holdings (Devon) Ltd Peer · rank #5 | OT OnCue Transport (You) · target supplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
01ActivityVolume, scale, freshness | ||||||
| 12-month contractedAward value, last 12m | £2.3m | £1.4m | £673k | £484k | £274k | — |
| Framework headroomPer-supplier share of framework ceilings | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Total awarded (lifetime)All time, all contracts | £3.6m | £2.4m | £673k | £1.3m | £1.2m | — |
| Contracts won (12m)Distinct awards last year | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | — |
How to read a target cell
The target column carries a delta — value compared to the peer median for that row. Direction-of-good varies by metric, so deltas are neutral.
Peer cell£499m(peer median £255m)
→
Target cell£11.7m(−97% vs median)
Money:
£N.Nm, £Nk, £N.NbnPercent: 42% · pp delta: (+12pp)Day delta: (−149 days) · missing: —